'The Twilight Saga: New Moon' worldwide total nearing $500 million


Less than two weeks ago, The Twilight Saga: New Moon was released to theaters, making history with the largest opening day total ever. Needless to say, the remaining few who were as yet unaware of the Twilight "juggernaut" were caught by surprise, and the numbers continue to "confound us all."

You already knew that New Moon pulled in good views on Friday ("Black Friday"), but as an update the weekend figures are in.

The AFP is reporting that The Twilight Saga: New Moon brought in $42.5 million this weekend, putting its total domestic gross at $230.7 million - well past that of 2008's Twilight ($192.7 million, give or take).

Not only were the domestic sales large, but the international take was pretty hefty as well.

The Hollywood Reporter is reporting that The Twilight Saga: New Moon brought in a total of $85.1 million from international markets this weekend, rounding out the international gross to a cool $243 million . . . wowza! Big sellers, according to this report, overseas were Germany ($18 million), the United Kingdom ($31.5 million), France ($28 million), Australia ($23 million), and Italy ($23 million).

The combined total from domestic and international sales, according to THR, is $473.7 million. That's nearly $500 million in less than two weeks on the market. Astounding, huh?

Source

Eclipse update from David Slade



My 'New Moon' balloon deflated...

After months of viewing trailers, spoilers, photo's, interviews and Youtube fan video's, I went into the 12:01 a.m. showing of New Moon with extremely high expectations.  Unfortunately, it didn't take long for the disappointment to set in. (egads! I said it!)


I'll start with Edward because, well, it's Edward.  I think his hair was way too flat, skin way too white, lips way too red and eyes way too orange.  Insignificant I know, but annoying just the same. Also, being that Edward's appearance in New Moon was limited, I felt a couple of the scenes he was in were rushed. (i.e.)  his reaction after speaking to Jacob and being told Charlie was making funeral arrangements.  That was the first physical scene he was in after he left Bella and felt that more time should've been spent on his anguish. (Crushing the cell phone in his hand just didn't work for me).  He's strong, I get it.  But what about his heart? I was expecting him to drop to the floor in agonizing devastation. I also thought his visit to the Volturri in his request for death, again rushed.  Where's was the dialogue as in the book? Two pivotal scenes, glossed over and brief.


I give it to Catherine Hardwick.  Her version of twilight may have not followed the book as did New Moon, nor the effects as spectacular as New Moon, but she captured and brought out the chemistry between Robert and Kristen.  In New Moon, I felt Chris Weitz failed to do that.  At times it  felt like Robert was reading lines from the script and found myself asking, "Does Edward even like Bella?". During most of the break up scene, he briefly looked into Bella's eyes.  Whereas Twilight, his eyes hardly left hers. That stare...gone.  (Still insignificant to many, but vital to the characters just the same).


There was no heart stopping moment between Edward and Bella (except the birthday kiss the night before the break up).  I felt the reunion scene at the clock tower fell short.  Where was all the footage of them wrapped in eachother's arms kissing that made it's way to the internet or youtube? That was another scene I felt was rushed.  The dialogue between Edward and Bella was limited and again, brief. That was a key scene that should've followed the book exactly.  Although the fight scene effects of Edward getting his ass kicked was worth the watch,  where was the intensity between Edward and Bella? 


Kristen Stewart, on the other hand, I thought did extremely well.  After watching her portray Bella in Twilight (most scenes her just shaking her head as if in disgust)  I never thought she would be able to pull off Bella's sorrow.  But she did.  Her scenes with Jacob had heart, chemistry.  Which, by the way, I felt Taylor Lautner owned the movie.  It was his and he ran with it.  Kudos to Taylor!


I also want to know what drugs Make-up/Wardrobe was on.  In "Twilight" all the vampires were gorgeous.  In "New Moon" I felt as if they were dressed much older than what they were.  Ex.  what the fuck was that garb Carlisle was dressed in for vote scene?  Ridiculous, but not as ridiculous as that poodle wig Jasper was sporting.  Seriously, didn't anyone from production say, "Hey wait a minute, he looks ridiculous"?


Ok so some may say I'm nit-picking.  So be it.  Like I said, I went in with high expectations.  I also didn't truly appreciate the job Catherine Hardwick did with Twilight until I saw "New Moon".  Would I want Chris Weitz back as director for "Breaking Dawn"?  At this point my thoughts are Summit would have to hire an extremely talented director to bring that mess to the big screen.  Do I think Melissa Rosenberg has the writing skills to make the transitition from book to the big screen and be successful? NO. And that's not dissing Melissa.  I think she tied "New Moon" together nicely.  She stayed true to Stephenie Meyers dialogue and I attribute that to the success of "New Moon." But I've said it before,  I think Breaking Dawn was ridiculously bizarre and I just think a script of that magnitude would not be best served written by her.


I will give credit where credit is due.  Although I think Chris Weitz fell short on capturing the chemistry between Robert and Kristen, he did a great job with the special effects.  If anyone really gives a shit, I give New Moon 3 stars and that's because I love the saga regardless!

Stunts, Press and Vampires

Nice, safe fucking answer Rob!

'New Moon' Director Chris Weitz Tells EW: 'If You Stay True To The Book, You Win'


"This was made for the fans, and if you don't get it, then you don't get it," "New Moon" director Chris Weitz told Entertainment Weekly when they interviewed him for their December 4 "New Moon"-focused cover story.

When EW went to meet Chris at his beach house after the film's release, they said he looked "like a wilted rose. He’s unshaven, pale and wearing clothes he appears to have found wadded in a ball on his bedroom floor." The man has been exhausted by the recent press tour insanity surrounding the record-breaking film (“I’m at the point of physical collapse,” he told the mag, and recently admitted he wants to retire after making one final movie), but at least he is not letting the film's negative reviews get him down.

"What I’ve realized over the last week is I won’t necessarily get good reviews for this movie," he admitted. "Having been a reviewer myself, there are only two ways to spin this story. You can either be the one guy who says this is a great movie, or more likely, take a more jaundiced view of the whole thing. And given the media blitz that has accompanied 'New Moon,' it’s rather unsurprising."


Chris admitted that this was the movie he wanted to make, though the way he explained it to EW was that he was more concerned about the look of the film than its content.

"In terms of what I wanted to do with the gloss of the picture, the look of the picture, I’m very satisfied with it," he said. "And satisfied to touch back with the crew and the actors and to feel we made it under humane conditions as well. No actors were harmed in the making of this movie."
He added, "I had this theory that if you stay true to the book, you would win. You would not only win with the fans, but other people will get what the fans care about. If the box office tells us anything, then it’s a win."

He was quick to draw comparisons to his last attempt at a book-to-film adaptation, "The Golden Compass." Chris noted that in its opening weekend, "New Moon" made more money than "The Golden Compass" made in its entire run. But the bad experience with the studio destroying his vision for "Compass" wasn't enough to keep him away from this story and these actors, he said.

"The studio, my editor, and I were all working off the same piece of music," said Chris in regards to "New Moon." "The only way I can make that interesting is to compare it to my previous experience of "The Golden Compass." I don’t think the studio had read the book. Maybe they had heard the audio book while sipping Zinfandel. Eventually, they were appalled and frightened by it. At a certain point they considered cutting loose the author. They considered and executed the complete regearing and destruction of what I thought was going to be a pretty good movie. It was a shame and pursued me through what should have been my sleep for a good year."
As for the main heartthrob of the box office smash, Robert Pattinson, he says he now thinks he understood how the Beatles felt back in the day. "I imagine it was close to this," he said. "Very few human beings will ever get to experience the love we feel at 'Twilight' events.”
To read the rest of the interview with Chris and learn more about how the movie became such a success, check out the EW story here and buy all three covers of the magazine when it hits shelves Nov. 27!

Source


Robert ‘intimidated’ by cult status

London Hollywood heartthrob Robert Pattinson is frightened by the "cult personality" that surrounds him and his 'Twilight' co-star Kristen Stewart after the success of the vampire romance.
The actor, who plays Edward Cullen in the blockbuster franchise, said he has struggled with the phenomenal success of the films, Contactmusic reported.
"Of course I am delighted that the 'Twilight' series is so successful. But the cult of personality that is around me and Kristen is a bit frightening.
"That is absolute madness, and you ask yourself, where do all these people come from? That's a very bizarre situation, even a bit intimidating," the actor said.
The 23-year-old star, who rose to global stardom with the surprise success of the vampire romance, revealed that he was once stalked by a crazy Spanish fan even before his 'Twilight' success.
"But a bad experience happened only once, but that was before 'Twilight'. Two years ago, I was filming an independent film in Spain, and every day a girl stood in front of my apartment. She was a stalker, which was soon very unpleasant."
Pattinson believes that the only good thing to come out of his instant fame is that he gets to stay in fancy hotels.
"You're staying in fancy hotels with incredibly nice bathrooms. This is the best thing I can say about it."
The actor has reprised his role in the second film 'New Moon', which has had a record breaking opening at the box office since its release on November 20.

Source 

Robert Pattinson's New Moon wardrobe


You have to imme­di­ately like a cos­tume designer who’ll admit that she’s wear­ing sweat­pants while chat­ting with you from her Van­cou­ver home. We phoned Tish Mon­aghan, who took over styling duties for The Twi­light Saga: New Moon and Eclipse, to talk about how Edward ended up in a suit, why Jacob’s mus­cles are bulging through his shirt (when he actu­ally wears one), what depart­ment man­dated that the wolf pack’s jean shorts be extra tight, and more.
ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: Any­one who’s lis­tened to the Twi­light DVD com­men­tary knows that Robert Pat­tin­son wasn’t a fan of Edward’s pea coat.
TISH MONAGHAN: He wasn’t a fan of the pea coat. He wore it in vir­tu­ally every scene, and I think maybe he just got tired of it. I’m guess­ing. [Laughs] He just wanted a more mature look. That was part of Edward’s Grade 11 year, and now he’s get­ting into his grad­u­a­tion year, he’s in a rela­tion­ship. He had worn hood­ies and jeans and sneak­ers, and Robert, the direc­tor [Chris Weitz], and I all wanted to por­tray him more as a gen­tle­man, more ele­gant and clas­sic. With our vam­pire char­ac­ters, I always went back to the time period in which they were turned to see if there’s any ele­ment I could try to sim­u­late in con­tem­po­rary cloth­ing. He came out of the Edwar­dian period, around 1910. Of course, most of the gen­tle­man from that time would be wear­ing suits, coats, hats, etc. We had to pick some­thing that was iconic for the char­ac­ter that would suf­fice to be used through­out the whole film. At the very begin­ning of the film, he has one school out­fit, and then there’s Bella’s birth­day party and dis­as­ter strikes. So Edward ends up in that same cos­tume for the remain­der of the film. I was think­ing of just putting him in a dress shirt and a pair of pants, but Robert wanted to be in a suit.

So I found a mod­ern con­tem­po­rary look that would be appeal­ing to him and to the mas­sive fan base, a very slim cut, and a fab­ric that to me was a bit Old World — this beau­ti­ful tweed fab­ric that we got out of Eng­land. It had the gray base, which is kind of essen­tial for the Cullen char­ac­ters in their cool tones, but also had lit­tle inter­est­ing flecks of blue, which is also Cullen, and a tiny lit­tle bit of rust, which I liked because Bella wears earth tones and that kinda linked her into the pic­ture. The gen­eral tex­ture of the suit would hold up well no mat­ter what set­ting he was in: Inside the house for the party, or in the for­est, or in the Vol­turi cham­ber. We had to show wear on the suit, and it’s much eas­ier to rough up some­thing that has tex­ture to it than just a flat piece of wool. His pants are worn at the knees, they’re rumpled.
I don’t know if anyone’s look­ing at his pants when he removes his shirt in Italy.
The fans were very excited to see that, I don’t know if Robert was par­tic­u­larly excited to per­form that in front of 1,500 peo­ple. I think it was quite hard for him to do. We orig­i­nally tested Edward in a plain white shirt, as a forlorn-looking option. That is also what Robert wanted — he wanted some­thing that would wash him out. But you need to have a color that makes you pop, and so we actu­ally dyed the fab­ric this beau­ti­ful ink blue our­selves. It high­lighted his vam­pire white skin really well. I think it’s a great moment when we see him in these clothes that he’s worn from Sep­tem­ber to May. When he goes to sac­ri­fice him­self, he’s in dis­re­pair. Robert and Chris wanted his shirt to have a rip across the chest, so that’s what we gave him. It’s really kind of tragic to watch him take off his shirt, because he really is sac­ri­fic­ing him­self. It looks like he’s just giv­ing up. He’s expos­ing him­self and he’s com­pletely vul­ner­a­ble, and he just takes his shirt off and he drops it at his feet with his eyes down­cast. Then he gets attacked by Bella, who shoves him inside the doors. [Laughs] I don’t find it like a beef­cake moment. It really is a mov­ing moment, and I think Robert did a really amaz­ing job for that scene.
The tear across the chest was to sym­bol­ize that his heart was torn out when he thought he lost Bella?
Maybe. [Laughs] They just said, “Rip it across the chest.” I said, “Are you sure? No shirt’s gonna rip like this.” And they said, “Yes.” So I did it.
Why couldn’t he remain shirt­less for the indoor fight scene? Why put on the robe?
Orig­i­nally, the guards who grab him were sup­posed to be com­ing from the out­side — that’s why they give him the robe. But the set­ting was changed, and they grab him on the inside. So why do they hand him this robe? Because, quite hon­estly, it looks very cool fight­ing with this long, flow­ing gar­ment, and it does hide pads, pro­tect him.

Breaking Dawn imminent



After the 'Twilight' sequel's opening weekend, Michael Welch and others assume Summit announcement is coming soon. The signs, it would seem, are everywhere. It might just be the worst-kept secret in all of Hollywood. So, why hasn't the "Breaking Dawn" movie been announced yet?

For starters, according to the Hollywood Reporter, Summit Entertainment just announced a television deal with FX to broadcast four "Twilight" films. Rob Pattinson told us that the movie might be filmed in Portland. Ryan Seacrest's radio show recently furthered the rumor (heard from a Summit exec's wife at a nail salon, mind you) that the final "Twilight" book was being split into two movies. And then there's the fact that it would be preposterous that an opening of $143 million in could be ignored and everyone would just release "Eclipse" and call it a day.

The morning after "New Moon" completed its opening-weekend domination, we went straight to one of the stars of the franchise. And Michael Welch, who plays Mike Newton, was the first to admit that a "Breaking Dawn" movie is as inevitable as death, taxes and grandparents wanting to pinch your cheeks during the holidays.

"Yeah, they're not going to make 'Breaking Dawn,' " grinned the actor who plays Mike Newton, dripping with sarcasm. "Of course, they are.

"I hope I'm not giving away any secrets here," he added playfully. "Now I'm going to get a call from Summit later: 'Why'd you give it away? It was going to be a big surprise!' "

Welch isn't the only one who has no problem talking as if a "Breaking Dawn" movie were far from hypothetical. Ashley Greene, Jamie Campbell Bower, RPattz and Kellan Lutz are among the many who've weighed in over the last few weeks.

"Could you imagine if they didn't make it? If they just said, 'We're going to move on; we're going to move on to our next Nicolas Cage movie,' " Welch teased. "It doesn't make any sense. Of course, it's going to be made; it just is."

For their part, the studio will only respond with a brief comment on the matter: "Summit Entertainment looks forward to bringing 'Breaking Dawn' to the big screen," they said this week in a statement. "But at this point any additional information is premature."

Apparently, that would include what Michael told us is the word amongst the cast. "I don't know how much of this I'm supposed to be giving away; as you can tell, I'm a little more relaxed about the whole thing [now that 'New Moon' did so well]," he explained. "But I heard a rumor that it's going to be made into two films, maybe. It would make sense — there's a lot to the story.

"That's what they're doing with the last 'Harry Potter' movie," Welch said of the move to film "The Deathly Hallows" as separate films to be released in the next two years. "I imagine that they want to prolong this as long as they can."

Asked if he'd prefer to shoot "Breaking Dawn" as two films, Welch said it's a no-brainer. "I think so, yeah," he explained. "There's a lot to get in. ... It doesn't seem like the energy is dying down anytime soon.

"I assume that if it's going to be made — at least, the one film — it would have to start being made pretty soon; early next year, by February or March," he said of when he'd expect cameras to roll, which is a tad bit earlier than Pattinson recently speculated to Collider.com. "That's why we've made these movies so close together; because vampires aren't supposed to be looking older. ... I assume there's going to be an announcement pretty soon. ... It'll probably be coming sometime in the next couple weeks."



Source


.

I Cannot Fucking Wait (here we go again)

Remember Me...



From Exam­iner:

As the New Moon breaks records, atten­tion should be brought to a trailer with a release date in March of 2010. No, not Eclipse, but rather Remem­ber Me, a film which could legit­imize Robert Pat­tin­son as an actor and not just a Teen Beat cover boy.

Remem­ber Me is filled with an amaz­ing cast: the impec­ca­ble, Acad­emy Award win­ner Chris Cooper, Pierce Bros­nan and Lena Olin. Robert is enlisted to play Tyler, a poetic mis­fit, who wants to be his own man but does not know how to find the path to becom­ing one. His father, por­trayed by Bros­nan, does not know what to do with him, which only leads to Tyler’s greater alienation.

Until, he meets Ally who gives him a spark at a real rela­tion­ship. She is quirky as is he, so it just might be ideal. That is, until her father played by Cooper steps in as the cop who busted Tyler ear­lier on with whom only ten­sions rise between them as Tyler’s rela­tion­ship with Ally grows.

Yes, this sounds like every other lost teenage romance film, with the idea of “To hell with every­one else!” This film is directed by Allen Coul­ter who has directed pri­mar­ily tele­vi­sion shows (as well as the very under­rated Hol­ly­wood­land) but therein lies the poten­tial strength of this film. His resume includes The Sopra­nos, Rome (HBO), Six Feet Under and Sex in the City. All of these shows have one major thread in com­mon. They are very character-driven. Which is good news for Pat­tin­son fans.
Addi­tion­ally, the movie will bring together a for­mi­da­ble love inter­est in Emi­lie de Ravin who plays Ally. She has great charisma and shines forth on the screen. This will be a much bet­ter pair­ing than Robert and Kristin, screen-wise.
If the trailer is any indi­ca­tion, Remem­ber Me promises to be the one film Pat­tin­son does that will not be forgotten.

.

Robert on Edward & New Moon

 
         Is he not deliciously sexy in this video or what?


 

Twilight Spoof...this is TFF

Eclipse to be the most guy friendly yet?


Unless you've been living under a rock the past few months, you'll know that a teensy little film called "New Moon" came out this past weekend and made a blockbuster-worthy $140 million in the past three and a half days. But most of that insane opening weekend appeal can be attributed to a year's worth of Twilighter fanaticism and marketing, and only time will tell whether "New Moon" can sustain its box office hold beyond just fan interest. In fact, most critics knocked the movie because it stayed so close to the book and didn't deviate enough to let those not familiar with "Twilight" in. Enter "Eclipse." The third installment of "The Twilight Saga" has already finished filming and is slated for a June 30, 2010 release. It is arguably the best in the series (arguable because it is my favorite, obviously), but it is also the book that propelled Stephenie Meyer's novels into the insane popularity they now have. That's right; it was only two years ago that not everyone and their mother knew about Bella and Edward. There are a number of different elements that allow "Eclipse" to reach beyond the vampire/human love story appeal, so read beyond the jump to figure out why you (read: boys) might too be interested in this movie. Needless to say, spoilers lie ahead.
More of a focus on the supernatural elements of vampires and werewolves
I'm sure Bram Stoker rolled over in his grave when sparkly, vegetarian vampires became the newest blood-sucking craze. Sure it took her two very long books to get to it, but in "Eclipse," Stephenie Meyer finally delves into the history of her creatures and how they fit into the world as we know it. Which leads us to…
Backstories
Much of "Eclipse"'s length comes from the amount of time Meyer spends on explaining the backstories of her various secondary characters. The reason why vampires and werewolves hate each other is finally revealed, as is the history of the Cullen family. When we talked to Jackson Rathbone, he told us that flashbacks of Jasper's younger vampire days during the Civil War will make it into the film, while he is explaining to Bella (Kristen Stewart) the nature of…
Victoria's newborn vampire army
That's right, these vampires go on mass vampire-creating sprees. Turns out, newborn vampires in Stephenie Meyer's world are significantly more powerful than your average vampire, but also a lot more unreliable. Jasper learned all about this during the Civil War, when the vampire who turned him used him to help create her own newborn army. This time -- meaning the present-day of "Eclipse" -- it's both the Cullens and the Quileute wolf pack who have to face them in…
The final battle
Sure there's the ballet studio scene at the end of "Twilight," and the made-for-film fight between Edward (Robert Pattinson) and Felix (Daniel Cudmore) at the end of "New Moon" (and I won't even get into the mess of an ending in "Breaking Dawn"), but at the end of "Eclipse" there is a no-holds-barred epic battle between the Cullens and their werewolf allies against Victoria (now played by Bryce Dallas Howard) and her army. Granted, in the novel Bella is far from the battle being protected from Victoria by Jacob (Taylor Lautner) and Edward, but we're sure that will be remedied in the film. It will cut back and forth nicely with...
The tent scene
Maybe the boys won't like this one so much, but the tent scene from the "Eclipse" chapter "Fire and Ice" is the ultimate showdown between Edward and Jacob. Bella and Edward's sappy love in "Twilight" and the sexual tension-filled friendship between Jacob and Bella in "New Moon" come together in a great moment that even the most anti-"Twilight" female could enjoy. And probably even some of the guys too. Don't worry, I tell anyone you secretly liked it.

Source
.

Go TwiMoms!!!

 

Twilight Moms Big Part Of Opening Weekend Box...

The 'Twilight' sequel, 'New Moon', earned more than $140 million this weekend...the third best opening weekend in movie history. 
UNDATED—‘The Twilight Saga: New Moon’ features steamy, smoldering looks…shirtless young men who happen to be vampires, or werewolves…and exactly four kisses…but not one sex scene. And, for women and girls…who made up eighty percent of the opening weekend audience…that may be the core of twilight’s appeal.
It’s a rather stark comparison with other vampire fare. From Bela Lugosi…to HBO’s ‘True Blood’...vampires are often strongly associated with the libido.
The ‘Twilight’ books, upon which the movies are based, were written by Stephanie Meyer, a Mormon…who makes her lead vampire, Edward, a chaste and noble protector of love interest, Bella. Which may explain why the movie is not only a hit among girls…but also tens of thousands of so-called “Twilight Moms.“
If, for the next installment, the moviemakers want to attract Twilight boys and dads, they may have to revert to the more lusty vampires, of course, with $140 million, they might not need the guys!

Source
.

How much New Moon cash will Rob and Kristen get?


About New Moon: With all these pots of money the movie is earning, does the cast get to share in the windfall? At the very least will they gets cars or Rolexes or something? And are these kids finally A-listers now?
—Scarlett via the Answer B!tch inbox

As much as you may think that Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart each deserve a brand new shiny Volvo for delivering all that magic over the weekend, as far as I know, they'll just have to settle for millions and millions of dollars.
As for a piece of the action and other perks, well...
...yes, according to reports, the deals afforded to Stewart and Pattinson include not only a raise from about $2 million on the original Twilight to about $12 million, but also a percentage of the profits.
That $12 million figure applies per film, according to the Chicago Sun-Times, meaning that, presumably, Stewart and Pattz got at least an additional $12 million for Eclipse, and they should get something close—or, let's hope, better—for Breaking Dawn.
And that's standard for successful franchises.
"The percentage is usually pretty small—5 percent or less—but I have seen them higher," entertainment attorney Christopher J. Cabott tells me. "In most cases, the costs to make the film never get fully recouped and the talent's percentage never comes into play. On a blockbuster like Twilight: New Moon, however, the costs should get recouped and the talent's percentage on net profits should equate to a handsome payday."
Gifts are also common, and I have no doubt that if Summit is smart, it'll at least toss Taylor Lautner some new shirts. (No reliable reports indicate what kind of pay raise Lautner earned for his near overnight bulking up to play Jacob Black, but lawyers tell me he's likely getting a hefty increase, too.)
Such traditions have been going on for quite a while.
Way back in the 1990s, when Macaulay Culkin was considered merely a jaded child actor and not a jaded adult actor, he starred in franchise called Home Alone. When it came times for Home Alone 2, Mac got a pay raise from $100,000 (and no percentage deal or "points") to $5 million and 5 per cent of the profits. That made him Hollywood's first millionaire movie star born in the 1980s. The Culkin family was also offered a Range Rover by Fox studios as an incentive to sign on for Home Alone 2 before the first film's release.
As to your second question, they're not A-listers yet.
The true definition of an A-lister is an actor who can open a film on name alone and do it across many, many demographics, from teens to retirees. Pattz may have women, but old dudes have yet to get on that train.
"This film is very much character based," Cabott rightly points out, "and the characters are adapted from a series of books. The cast was selected primarily on who best personified the book's characters and not so much on how their acting fit the script."
That is, if they even want to keep acting. Like Harry Potter star Emma Watson, these kids may make so much money off of their percentage deals that they never have to take a role they hate, ever again.

Source

Spanish Interview with Rob discussing New Moon, Unbound Captives, Bel Ami & Breaking Dawn

New Moon behind the scenes footage

Robert: Eclipse could be rated R


Robert Pattinson has revealed that the follow-up to New Moon could receive an adult rating.
The 23-year-old actor has said that Eclipse, the third instalment of the Twilight saga, is a "massively different movie" that could potentially be rated R due to its "huge" battle sequences, STV reports.
Pattinson said: "It’s a massively different movie to New Moon. There’s so many more main parts, and having these huge battle sequences, I’ve never done anything like it in any of the other movies.
"I think it’s really pushing the - I don’t know what rating Twilight was in England, like the American PG-13 or 18 - I think it’s pushing it to the absolute limit. It would be so funny if it was R-rated."

Source


What a DICK

Repeating my sophomore year of high school for 12 straight years has pretty well inured me to ever feeling out of place, but once in a while I still feel like I've stumbled into the wrong theater.
Twilight isn't exactly my cup of tea. The very thought of a 17-year-old girl falling helplessly in love with a 109-year-old man fills me with a deep and enduring sense of jealousy. I mean, wrongness. Definitely wrongness.
But I watch tons of things I'm not especially interested in, like my boss complaining to me about roasting suckling pigs under my desk, or the insides of my eyelids for eight hours a night.
I think it's more that, whatever I might think of it, The Twilight Saga has evoked such excitement you can almost feel it in the theater -- and I'm not a part of that. I'm just some lone, badly-shaved guy who's constantly dropping my hands to my lap (I'm taking notes!) during the hotbodied teen vampire event that is The Twilight Saga: New Moon.
Kristen Stewart's another year older, but vampire boyfriend Robert Pattinson and his family haven't aged a day -- and the town's starting to notice. It's time for them to move along, but Pattinson can't take Stewart with him, because she's in danger every moment she spends around his blood-tempted family.
Heartbroken, Stewart finds solace in her friendship with Taylor Lautner. Lautner's interested in being more than friends, but his dark secret threatens to drive him away from Stewart completely.
Who will Stewart choose? The buff old friend who's good with his hands and just likes spending time with her? Or the brooding, sparkly, suicide-prone headcase who thinks she can't take care of herself, refuses to respect her desires, and leaves her forever because he knows what's best?
Find out all that and more in New Moon, the ongoing story of paranormal assholes and the women who love them.
As the second installment in the series, it's brisker than the slow-as-a-decaying-sloth Twilight, and features some welcome development for Stewart, who spent the whole first movie being disgracefully worthless. In the months after Pattinson leaves her, she transforms from a helpless lump of meat into a helpless lump of meat with terrible, terrible judgment whose only sense of self-worth comes from whatever man she's currently attached to.
When she's not passing out lovesick in the forest (she spends more time in the woods than Smokey the Bear), she's hopping on the motorcycles of drunken quasi-rapists or diving off eighty-foot cliffs into pounding waves. Perversely, this is all supposed to be swooningly romantic: see, Stewart gets delusional ghost-visions of Pattinson whenever she does something fatally stupid, so if repeatedly risking her life is the only way she can see that condescending prick, then repeatedly risk her life she must.
This is about as healthy as napping in an industrial sausage-grinder, but as the only love I've ever felt, ironically enough, is for my daily box of Count Chocula, I probably have no room to judge.
New Moon has other problems besides its horrifyingly insane perspective on romance. Director Chris Weitz does a decent job spinning the plates of the saga's expanding universe, but it's so jammed with worldbuilding and plot developments its two-hour runtime feels both too short and too long. New melodrama pops up with regular and jarring abruptness; its biggest scenes are frustratingly compressed, robbed of tension by the need to cover some 600 pages of adapted material.

Not only that, but its supposed love triangle also is a cheating cheater, and not in the fun way where one leg of the triangle cries while the other two get naked together. Coincidence prevents Lautner from kissing Stewart about 12,000 different times. Thank goodness her oral purity's been preserved! Now she can still wear white at her wedding.

Without facing any real threat to her love for Pattinson, just what are we supposed to be caught up in? New Moon is a holding pattern and a shell game. It's an improvement over Twilight, but after two hours spent with jerks being jerks to other jerks, I'm glad I don't have problems like these.

Source

"its biggest scenes are frustratingly compressed, robbed of tension by the need to cover some 600 pages of adapted material. "

Unfortunately I agree with that sarcastic fuck.


Anna Kendrick calls Rob a "hooligan"

Post New Moon fan made video

Robert Pattinson Says Bella Will Show Treachery In Twilight ‘Eclipse’ Movie


Robert Pattinson says Bella will show treachery in TwilightEclipse’ movie. MTV news recently caught up with Robert Pattinson about three nights ago in New York to talk a little bit about the “Twilight Saga : New Moon” sequel, “Twilight Saga: Eclipse.” Robert Pattinson plays Bella’s vampire love interest, Edward Cullen.
Robert said his favorite scene will be,when Bella (Kristen Stewart) shows a little bit of treachery,and that it’ll be a good scene.
Next, they talked about his new movie coming up called, “Remember Me.” He said, he hopes it gets the same type of fan base that the “Twilight Saga” movies get,but it’s not really similar to it at all.
His latest flick to hit theaters, “Twilight Saga: New Moon” just broke “midnight” and “single day” ticket sales records this weekend. So if you haven’t seen it yet,go check it out.
“Twilight Saga: New Moon” is in theaters now. “Twilight Saga: Eclipse” will arrive June 30, 2010.

Source


Rob & Kristen Keep Their Distance at New Moon Screening



Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart caused a fan frenzy when they showed up – separately – for the Cinema Society and D&G screening of New Moon Thursday in New York City.

Wearing a sleek Dolce & Gabbana suit, a button-down and his famously touseled hair, Pattinson worked the red carpet at the Landmark Sunshine Theater as dozens of cameras flashed and fans broke down into tears. "Robert completes me!" exclaimed one 11-year-old fan.

Pattinson – who plays sexy vampire Edward Cullen to Stewart's soulful teenager Bella Swan – arrived at the screening about 20 minutes before his rumored real-life love Stewart made her appearance on the red carpet.
 
After Pattinson went into the theater, Stewart (dressed in Valentino) arrived and posed for pictures with costar Nikki Reed – then skipped the screening altogether.

And while Pattinson and Stewart avoided a red carpet run-in, their New Moon costars artfully dodged questions about the pair's rumored romance.

"Whatever their lives are people should let them have their privacy," said Peter Facinelli, who plays the Cullen family patriarch in the Twilight series.

Meanwhile Kellan Lutz, who plays Pattinson's onscreen brother Emmett, played up the dumb blonde stereotype. When asked about his costars' relationship, Lutz, who recently dyed his hair, joked, "I'm a blond. I don't think about anything!"

Later in the night, Pattinson and Stewart both partied at AVENUE lounge where they were escorted to a corner table on the mezzanine and were seen talking and laughing.

Source

More photos from the NYC screening here.

'New Moon' Ending Surprises Fans Who Read The Book



"New Moon" director Chris Weitz seems pretty pleased with the way he ended the second movie in the "Twilight Saga." But the fans who have already gotten a chance to see the movie are still reeling from Weitz's directorial decision. Not to give too much away, but some said it wasn't the conclusion they'd expected.
"I was really surprised by the ending, the way they kept us hanging like that," Jordana de la Cruz from Rhode Island told MTV News, after seeing a midnight screening in New York. "I hated it, but I liked it at the same time."

Several fans who had read Stephenie Meyer's novels regarded the movie's ending, which involves Edward and Bella on the verge of something big, as the biggest surprise in the whole movie. "The book had more to the ending, and I liked where they left it here, like a cliff-hanger for the next one that's coming out," Twilight Mom Sandy Moffit from Illinois told us.
Jillian Rovrer from Daytona Beach, Florida, told us that though she was surprised by the ending, "it wasn't as exciting as other parts of the movie. It was to be expected."
Although the fans didn't want to give too much away when asked about it, they did reveal that fellow Twilighters are going to have the rug pulled out from under them. "I wouldn't. ... it's a spoiler, but the way it ended, what happened before the blackout, is the big deal," Habiba Tinubu said. "Everyone just screamed and was shocked that it ended."

Source
.

Robert at New Moon screening NYC 11.19.09



‘New Moon’ sets midnight showing record


(CNN) — The sec­ond install­ment in the “Twi­light” saga, star­ring Robert Pat­tin­son as vam­pire Edward Cullen, Kris­ten Stew­art as his star-crossed love and Tay­lor Laut­ner as the wolf­boy who loves her, has already ripped through a box office record.
Accord­ing to Hol­ly­wood trade mag­a­zine Vari­ety, “New Moon” is the biggest mid­night show­ing in his­tory, gross­ing $26.3 mil­lion when it opened in 3,514 the­aters at 12:01 a.m. Friday.
The film even sur­passed the super­nat­ural cin­ema force that is “Harry Pot­ter,” col­lect­ing more than the $22.2 mil­lion that “Harry Pot­ter and the Half Blood Prince” earned dur­ing its mid­night show­ing this summer.
“New Moon” has also eas­ily beaten its own pre­de­ces­sor, “Twi­light,” which earned $36 mil­lion on open­ing day last year. And while “Twilight’s” open­ing week­end was $69.7 mil­lion, early reports are that “New Moon” will do even better.
But along with the ticket sales bounty is backlash.
The Vat­i­can released an announce­ment Fri­day denounc­ing the film, which is based on Stephe­nie Meyer’s block­buster series.
“This film is noth­ing more than a moral vac­uum with a deviant mes­sage and as such should be of con­cern,” warns the Vatican’s cul­ture coun­cil leader, Mon­signor Franco Per­az­zolo, in a state­ment timed to the release of “New Moon,” accord­ing to E! Online.
“This theme of vam­pires in ‘Twi­light’ com­bines a mix­ture of excesses,” he con­tin­ued, “that, as ever, is aimed at young peo­ple and gives a heavy eso­teric element.”
Yet the kids these days appear to dig the “excesses” of “Twi­light.” Still, only time will tell if “New Moon” will also out­sell the cur­rent “best open­ing day” title­holder, “The Dark Knight,” which grossed $67.2 mil­lion when it opened July 18, 2008.

.

Rob on Ellen




Robert on Regis & Kelly



Go Twilight Moms!!!

Robert on The Today Show 11.19.09



Remember Me trailer


Oh dear God Rob you're killing me...
.....Let the countdown begin!




Robert Pattinson's appearance on The Late Show with David Letterman 11.18.09



Part 1

 
                                                            Part 2

The trinity on Jimmy Kimmel

"The wait is over" TV spot

Robgar? Yep, that's me!

Older Women crave New Moon Vampires...



(CNN) -- They don't call it "Twi Crack" for nothing.
Lisa Hansen, for example, thought she had lost her mind the first time she read "Twilight." Partly because she's 36.
"I was absolutely worried that something was wrong with me," the Utah mother of two said. "I just couldn't put it down -- I was obsessed completely."
She picked up the first of Stephenie Meyer's vampire novels -- recommended by a teen neighbor -- with few expectations. After devouring it, she couldn't get the images of doomed love between a vegetarian vampire, Edward, and an awkward teenage girl, Bella, off her mind. Hansen thought about the books so much she seriously wondered if she was experiencing some sort of midlife crisis.
"I thought I was the only woman in the world who was my age and was just obsessed with books," she said.
In reality, far from it. Hansen is just one of the thousands of women around the world who have gotten caught up in the vampire frenzy.
While they resemble the youthful, squealing "Twilight" fans on occasion -- Kellan Lutz, who plays vampire Emmett Cullen in the films, admitted some of the mail he gets from older fans makes him blush -- they're still not the typical fan girls.
For starters, being so in love with "Twilight" when you're "of a certain age" can come with a healthy dose of shame.
"The stigma of it being a teenager's book was the biggest issue," Hansen said. "Everyone felt the same way I did, like, 'What's wrong with me? Why am I obsessing over this teenager thing?' "
But, one by one, the women began to find each other online, relieved that they weren't the only ones.
"As grown women we know that we never forget our first love, the first time our heart was really broken," Hansen explained of the often indescribable pull of Meyer's work. "I just think that so many women can kind of identify with the experiences and emotions and underlying message of how difficult it is to make choices in life."
Since so many of "Twilight" fan sites were overrun with teenagers, adult women have erected their own digital havens for fans who could take only so much of the "OMG Edward's so hot!!!" reaction to "Twilight." There's Hansen's Twilight Moms Web site, which she started for married women and mothers who want to revel in their "Twilight" fandom, and sites like 49-year-old Patricia Kopicki's, which is for any adult "Twilight" fan, parent or not.
Both of them say they get steady streams of messages from women thanking them for helping them come out of their "Twilight" closet.
"Many of us [fans] are happily married with kids, some as old as the male leads in 'Twilight.' Some of them jokingly refer to themselves as 'cougars' because of this, but it's used as a humorous way of saying we realize we are old enough to be Robert Pattinson's mother [and] we still find him attractive," Kopicki said.
The cougar comes out of the closet
Historically, any woman nearing menopause was expected to be at home, raising kids and uninterested in sex, said Valerie Gibson, who claims credit for the concept of the "cougar."
"I wrote a book about older women and younger men in 1990, and let me tell you, the world was not ready for older women having sex with younger men," Gibson said. "Older women have always been indoctrinated to believe that they would get to a certain age and they were no longer wanted and sexy and desired. I think older women who have found their sexuality have always lusted after younger men but they were never, never allowed to say so."
She hopes the love and lust many of these women display for the "Twilight" characters and the much younger actors who play them will turn the stereotype on its head.
"We've got a whole new social phenomenon of older women saying, 'Who told me sexuality would die? It hasn't! Here it is still burning away, maybe not for the guy I've been with for 30 years, but it's still there,' " Gibson said. "They're embracing it now."
Indeed, the "Twilight" fans are very aware of the age gap between themselves and the objects of their oft-sexy fantasies, and, when given the space to express it, they aren't the least bit ashamed.
Jenny, a 32-year-old financial administrator who runs an adults-only "Twilight" blog mature enough to make her shy away from providing a last name, said women have thanked her for being so openly crass about her love of "Twilight" because it frees them to express desires in a way they wouldn't in real life.
"We love to talk about how sexy Rob Pattinson is and what we would do if we got close," she said. "We feed off each other -- we can be these racy, silly, just kind of goofy women about this. No one's being judged for being married and saying, 'I'm 54 and I think this 23-year-old is absolutely delicious.' "
Jenny, who runs the "Twitarded" site from New Jersey with her 41-year-old friend Debbie, said the books and movies have given her a new creative outlet.
"I get excited over things that I never have before," Jenny said. "I've never followed celebrities before and all of a sudden I'm talking about E! Online and Access Hollywood, and my boyfriend is like, 'You don't even watch TV.' "
If Robert Pattinson is on, she does now -- and her boyfriend doesn't mind. Neither does Debbie's husband. These women, for the most part, aren't desperately single and looking for love through a fictional book about teens, Debbie said.
"I wouldn't go back to dealing with teenage love in a million years. I'm happily married and I have a great relationship, so it's not that I feel that 'Twilight' is filling a void," Debbie added. "The appeal is that it's very simple and pure and it outlines this love story of someone who's average and normal with this stellar, amazing person who has eyes for no one but her and could save her from anything." Fans camp out for "New Moon"
Edward & Bella do S&M
It's the fantasy romance of Edward and Bella -- which all of the women acknowledge could never actually happen, a sign of maturity younger fans don't often express -- that inspires them to put some intensity back into their real-life relationships.
"It's helped relationships, because [the fans] are happier nowadays. They have more friends, even if it's just online friends, [and] they're racier now. We hear all the time that people's sex lives haven't been the same since," Debbie said.
Oddly enough, there's no sex in Meyer's novels, at least nothing that couldn't be replicated in the PG movies they're based on. That hasn't stopped the fans from creating their own sex scenes in copious amounts of fan fiction, some of which have themes like "Edward and Bella do steamy office affair," or "Edward and Bella try out S&M."
"It's a rekindling of old feelings, because when you're married and you've got kids and you're running around to the soccer and basketball and football games, [and you've got] work, bills ... the relationship gets pushed off to the side," explained Kopicki, herself a mother of two teenagers.
"Your husband may not look exactly like Edward, but just as men have their fantasies, women do too and they need to be able to express it," she added. "A book like 'Twilight' has brought that out."
Twilight Moms, by contrast, aims to keep things family-friendly. Hansen said she wanted the site to be something a woman can browse while in the presence of her kids. Nevertheless, Hansen acknowledges that even the more subdued older "Twilight" fans admit feeling attracted.
"Edward is just in a 17-year-old body, but he's actually 108," Hansen said with a laugh. "I have a friend who said she's able to justify her love for Jacob because she counts his age in dog years."
But when the actors are under 18, like Taylor Lautner, the 17-year-old who plays Jacob, is, all of the women agree that a line has to be drawn on the swooning.
"We're very careful about that, because even to me that would feel creepy," Hansen said. "And then we have the mothers who say, 'oh my gosh he's the same age as my son!'"
But, the fans said, no one's actually expecting to date Lautner, Pattinson or Lutz. In the end, the obsession with "Twilight" is all in the name of a good time between mothers and daughters, or new friends.
"We're having a really, really fabulous time being 30, 40, or 50. We're very unapologetic of our age," Jenny said. "Women are saying 'so what, I'm 45, I'm married, I have children, but there's no reason why I can't say that Robert Pattinson is hot.'"


My teenage son laughs when he calls me a pedophile.  I have to laugh too because, well, he just doesn't get it.  Yes, I may be old enough to be Rob's mom, but I look at this MAN and I see one hot motherfucker plain and simple. I suppose if I lusted after Rob during the Cedric Diggory era, that would be a bit creepy.  As it would be creepy If I lusted after Taylor Lautner, which I don't.  As nice a body as he has,  I just think he's a very cute kid. period. Even when Rob played Cedric on Harry Potter, I didn't think there was anything special about him.  Nothing about his looks stood out as anything other than a cute kid.

I was actually disappointed after I read "Twilight" when I learned that Robert Pattinson played the part of Edward Cullen. After the way Stephenie described him in her book and the image I created in my mind, when I learned it was Rob, I thought "OH NOOOO NOT CEDRIC".  But after I watched "Edward" walk through those cafeteria doors, it was OMFG cedric who?  I was already in love with the character of Edward Cullen.  I was in love with the love story and loved ALL the characters as well.  And because of that, it was very easy for me to become obsessed with Rob and the saga. 

Now I can't picture anyone other than Robert as Edward Cullen.  I'm even obsessed with the whole Robsten thing.  I suppose I should care less if they are together in "real" life, but because of the chemistry they share, who wouldn't want to see them together?







About this blog

Obsessed, Addicted and Devoted to Rob.